Archive for the ‘Current Affairs’ Category
Climate changes all the time.
How do we adapt to these changes in a way that assists the most vulnerable – that is, the poor?
One way is to adopt policies which will assist poorer people to develop the resources and strategies they need to buffer them from rapid climate change.
Another is to make sure we know what is going on, so we can make plans to cope with the changes that are actually occurring.
Because so much data has been lost/manipulated, etc, we have very little idea what has really happened over the last fifty years.
One thing is for sure. it isn’t getting any warmer.
It’s time we stopped playing global warming computer games, and started dealing with real world changes, and the real world needs of people who cannot, as Al Gore can, squander 200,000 kilowatt hours of electricity each year.
Tiger Woods will recover as a golfer. Can he recover as a person?
Brit Hume says it depends on his faith – what he needs is forgiveness and redemption.
Brit’s answer: Think about what the Christian faith has to offer.
Wow. It is interesting (and encouraging) to hear that kind of straight talking in a secular news commentary program.
Click to download the Easy Guide to the Politics and Science of Global Warming
It is a PDF file just over 1MB in size.
Feel free to copy, give to friends, post to politicians, etc!
One of the worrying things about the cherry-picking, data fudging, distorting, lying, fund-grabbing behaviour that has characterised global warming alarmism over the last two decades, is that we now have no idea at all what the climate has been doing.
Much of the original temperature data seems to have disappeared, leaving only value-less ‘value-added’ data.
What data we have, when the Urban Heat Island Effect is taken into account, along with the fudging and cheating, shows little or no warming, or even cooling.
Climate changes can be and have been devastating in the past, rapid cooling far more so than gradual warming.
There is nothing we can do to stop natural climate change.
We can prepare for it. And that preparation may save millions of lives.
There is no doubt that next major change will be towards a cooler world.
Let’s hope we can quickly get past the hiatus in real climate science caused by well-funded claims of non-existent anthropogenic global warming, and find real world data that will give us real world answers.
In the meantime, it is a deadly cold Winter in the Northern Hemisphere:
After considering a number of possible candidates for the next major science scare, the UN today annouced the winner was the asteroid Apophis.
‘We’ve got as much funding, and as many free holidays, as we are likely to get from global warming,’ UN Secretary-General Ban Ki Moon announced today. ‘It’s time to move on.’
‘The asteroid Apophis meets all the criteria for the next DSSO. There is a slim chance it could cause major destruction, on a scale the world has never seen.’ He said.
‘It will take billions of dollars in research funds, and several conferences, before we know whether this destruction is likely or or not. But the consequences of not acting are so dire, that even if the science is not proven, we owe it to our children and grandchildren to put the planet first, and give the world the benefit of the doubt.’
Anatoly Perminov told the Russian radio station Golos Rossii: “People’s lives are at stake. We should pay several hundred million dollars and build a system that would allow us to prevent a collision, rather than sit and wait for it to happen and kill hundreds of thousands of people.”
Mirrors, lights and even paint could change the way the object absorbed light and heat enough to shift its direction over 20 years or so. With less notice, mankind could be forced to take more drastic measures, such as setting off a massive explosion on or near the object to change its course.
Smoke and mirrors?
Same deal as climate change, then.
PS. Ban Ki Moon didn’t really say any of that. But he might as well have.
Another worthwhile therapeutic result from adult stem cells.
Useful applications from embryonic stems cells – 0. From non-destructive, ethical stem cell research, over 70, as at 2007.
Researchers have used stems cells taken from mice to create tooth buds. A small incision was made in the animals’ gums and the bud implanted. New teeth grew.
The tooth bud produces a new tooth, and the bone required to anchor the tooth to the jaw.
Professor Paul Sharpe, a specialist in the field of regenerative dentistry at the Dental Institute of King’s College, London, says the same techniques will produce similar results in humans:
Using a local anaesthetic, the tooth bud is inserted through a small incision into the gum. Within months, the cells will have matured into a fully-formed tooth, fused to the jawbone. As the tooth grows, it releases chemicals that encourage nerves and blood vessels to link up with it.
There were widespread reports yesterday that the death of an unborn child had brought Victoria’s Christmas road death toll to 12.
Quite right. The child was a person, and its death is a tragic loss.
But what makes this child a person, and another child at the same stage of development an object which is inconvenient, and which can be destroyed and disposed of?
There is no difference in the child – just in the parents’ attitude to it.
Is that all it takes to make one a person, and one not?
I’m with Horton – a person’s a person, no matter how small.
People Smugglers – Hear, hear!
Failing to acknowledge the crisis caused by its changes to Australia’s immigration policy, the Federal government is steadily digging itself into a very deep hole.
Most Australians want:
- Everyone who comes or wants to come to Australia to be treated with dignity.
- Preference given to people who are in genuine need, or have some clear benefit to offer (the two are not mutually exclusive, of course).
- Preference given to people who don’t try to push their way to the front of the queue.
- Overall immigration controlled in a way that takes note the of availability of infrastracture and environmental resources.
- Overall immigration controlled in a way that maximises opportunities for immigrants to integrate without excessive stress for them or for their new communities.
It can no longer seriously be denied that the Labor government has implemented a group of policies which encourage queue jumpers and those who prey on them.
60 boats carrying illegal immigrants have been intercepted on route to Australia in the last 12 months, compared with 18 boats in the previous six years.
The Christmas Island detention centre is overflowing.
Resources re-directed to illegal immigrants are stolen from people in greater need – people who follow the rules, wait in refugee camps, who do the right thing.
Why should they bother?
Our neighbours are asking us to think again, and to take responsibility for the difficulties caused not only to ourselves, but to them.
But still the mess caused by Labor’s new ‘compassionate’ policies has not dented the teflon brain of Prime Minister Kevin (Special Deal) Rudd.
But not a very informative one, unless we are told what that intake is being tripled from and to.
Reading the small print we find that FebFast, another charity group no one has ever heard of, undertook a survey which found that:
… most respondents drink one day a week and that during the festive period that increases to three days a week. One-third of Australians consume more than 10 standard drinks a week during the festive season.
That doesn’t sound too alarming to me.
“There’s nothing wrong with enjoying the summer and the season’s festivities, but we need to be aware of how much some Australians get carried away and take celebrations to excess,” FebFast chief executive Fiona Healy said in a statement.
Absolutely. An average of one a half drinks per day during the festive season. This outlandish festivity must be stopped.
I don’t fancy their chances in the Northern Territory, land of sweeping plains and swooning Kidmans, where no respondents to FebFast’s survey said they consumed too much alcohol.
Jo Nova has put together a massive wall chart of highlights (low lights?) from the FOI file of documents and emails from Hadley.
It details more than twenty years of data fudging, bullying of scientists with alternative views, pressuring scientific journals, hijacking the peer review process, and outright lying about the evidence for anthropogenic climate change by a small cabal of well-funded public servants.
The only disappointment is that Jo repeats the furphy about the medieval church silencing sceptics. Jo is usually a careful researcher and clear thinker, so this is a little surprising.
In reality, the medieval church was the friend of science, and consistently encouraged the asking of questions and the search for truth.
This is one of the reasons it is the West that has been the home of science, and Western thought which has provided so many of the answers to questions about the natural world.
But that hesitation aside, Jo’s wallchart is a product of a prodigious amount of work, displayed, as always, in a clear and interesting way.
A few belated suggestions for Tiger and the plastic playmates.
Some women chase sports stars, or anyone who is rich and famous.
When women approach you and offer to have sex with you, this is not because they like you, care about you, or want to get to know you better.
Women want to have sex with you because you are a trophy. The purpose of a trophy is to be displayed. So don’t expect them to keep quiet about it.
You make most of your money from sponsorships – manufacturers and retailers paying you to endorse their products.
They pay you to endorse their products because the they think the public trust you, and will believe you when you say that a product is of good quality and worth buying.
But if you show that your word means nothing, even when given to the people you love, why should the public believe you when you tell them to buy a certain brand of sneakers, or car, or life insurance?
And if there is no reason for the public to believe what you say, there is no reason for sponsors to pay you to say it.
If you dress, walk, talk, and generally act as if you think the only important thing about you is your sexuality, don’t be surprised if some men agree with you.
This means that instead of relating to you as a person with ideas and values and perspectives worth considering, they will relate to you only with an interest in the pleasure they imagine they could get from your body, that is, as a kind of masturbation aid.
This demeans both you and them.
It also almost certainly means that while you will be appreciated as a party girl, someone to date, a good sport, you will not be a person most men would want to have a long-term relationship with, one in which you and your thoughts and feelings are valued.
And I don’t blame them.
I for one was grateful for China’s new assertiveness at Copenhagen.
I am less impressed by the combination of insecurity about its internal politics and disregard of world opinion that is increasingly evident in China’s represssion of dissent, and limiting of its citizens’ access to news sources.
The eleven year sentence imposed on 53 year old professor of literature, Liu Xiaobo, for ‘subversion’ has drawn widespread condemnation from world leaders.
This has been ignored. Chinese leaders clearly believe (and rightly) that they have more to be worried about from their own citizens than from the current rash of limp wristed leftist Western leaders.
Yemen has conflicts with Al Qaeda in the South, and Al Houthis (a Shiite separatist group) in the North.
Neither group has widespread support in Yemen. Al Qaeda is seen as a threat by the West, because it has links to terror organisations around the world. But Al Qaeda has little popular support in Yemen, and appears to have no political ambitions other than destruction of anything and any regime associated with the West, and with the US in particular.
Al Houthis has political ambitions in both Yemen and Saudi Arabia.
“Al Qaida has no popular base, no political horizon and no alternative to the existing regime. They consider the state an enemy because of its alliance with the US,” Yemeni political expert Fares Saqqaf said.
At the same time, “Al Houthis are newly formed, as their first confrontation with the state was in 2004. They are close to people, and are followers of a certain Shiite sect (Yemen is prediminantly Sunni).
Yemen is the poorest of the gulf states, with limited oil supplies, and chronic water shortages.
Without US support against Al Qaeda, and Saudi support against Al Houthis, Yemen may well be in serious trouble.
The catch is that dependence on US aid may reduce Yemen’s credibility amongst other Arab states, and may increase the likelihood of attacks in the US.
The suspect, Nigerian-national Abdul Mudallad, said he received instructions and training from al Qaeda operatives based in Yemen ahead of boarding the Detroit-bound flight Friday, according to U.S. law-enforcement officials.
These officials said they couldn’t confirm Mr. Mudallad’s claims. But the purported bombing attempt came as Yemen’s security forces intensified military operations against al Qaeda forces, with significant U.S. intelligence support.
The US has provided nearly $70 million in counter-terrorism aid to Yemen this year, compared with nothing in the previous year.
Nearly half the terror suspects currently held by the US are Yemeni nationals.
Members of the Australian Defence Forces are currently deployed in the Solomon Islands, East Timor, Afghanistan, Israel and the Sinai, Sudan and Iraq, as well as in border protection around Australia.
Some 3800 Australian service men and women will be spending Christmas away from their families.
Thanks. And may God bless you and keep you safe, along with those you love.
Why do atheists insist on imposing their religious views on the rest of us?
Atheists are a tiny proportion of the population in Australia.
Seventy percent of Australians are Christians, or have some affiliation with a Christian church. Many of the rest are Sikhs, Muslims, Jews, or members of a myriad of smaller groups.
By all means let’s hear what the atheists have to say. But why should there be outrage from them when anyone else has a point of view on a matter of public policy?
On the flight from Adelaide I read bits of the Adelaide Advertiser over the shoulder of the man in the seat next to me.
There was an article by a woman I had never heard of and whose name I cannot remember, bemoaning the influence of Christianity in public life.
As examples of this nefarious influence, she pointed to the defeat of the voluntary euthanasia bill, and exemptions for religious groups from aspects of anti-discrimination legislation.
These exemptions provide, for example, that a muslim social welfare group does not have to employ a man who lives in a sexual relationship with another man, that a Jewish school does not have to employ someone who believes Jews are descended from pigs and monkeys, or that a catholic parish does not have to employ someone who thinks the pope is the anti-christ.
In other words, these exemptions are about protecting the feelings and beliefs of others, even when when we disagree with them. Even atheists. And I agree with the writer to the extent of acknowledging that this is indeed Chrstian influence at work.
Take two minutes to do a simple thought experiment.
Consider countries where there has been a long history of Christian influence in public life.
Now think of countries under Islamic or atheist regimes.
Where are you more likely to find justice and democracy? Where are you going to be safer if you are lesbian or homosexual? Where are women’s voices more likely to be heard? Where is there a higher level of wealth, of quality education and health services?
In which direction do refugees and immigration flow? Where would you rather live?
The writer of the Adelaide Advertiser article decries the fact the Tony Abbott has called for compulsory Bible classes. She says she is happy for the Bible to be taught in schools, with other fiction.
I am not sure Tony Abbott has called for compulsory Bible classes.
What he said was that it was impossible to understand Western culture; law, music art and literature, without a knowledge of the Bible. He is right.
One of the consequences of the influence of the Bible, and of Christianity in general, is that people like the woman who wrote the Advertiser article can parrot their ill-informed and poorly thought-out opinions and expect them to be taken seriously.
And thank God for that.