Just a little music to end the day.
One of my all time favourites, and the archetypal Patsy Kline song:
An interesting list of the top money-making films.
Avatar has made it into the top ten in just two weeks. This makes two films by James Cameron in the top ten – Avatar and Titanic.
Of the others, three of the top ten are Harry Potter movies, two are from the Pirates of the Carribean series, and two are Lord of the Rings.
That makes nine – the other is Dark Knight.
With the exception of Titanic, all of the top ten are fantasy.
Further down the list is Jurassic Park, Star Wars Episodes one and three, Spiderman, and more Harry Potter.
If nothing else, this proves people go to the movies to be entertained.
A startling revelation, I know, but it still doesn’t seem to have made it into the heads of Australian film producers.
We arrived home in SA on Saturday night. Before church the next morning, we went to McDonalds for breakfast (Well why not? – It is cheap and convenient, they make good coffee, and the hot cakes aren’t bad) and picked up a copy of the reliably abysmal Sunday Mail.
There was a short article about the tribunal into the behaviour of Bishop of The Murray Ross Davies.
The Archbishop of Adelaide has had an extraordinarily difficult task in dealing with what is the worst crisis in episcopal leadership in the history of the Anglican church in Australia.
Earlier in 2009 the Archbishop had announced an enquiry into Bishop Davies’ actions as Bishop. That enquiry produced some 100 signed statements from people around the diocese alleging various kinds of verbal, spiritual and emotional abuse. Once those statements had been received, a tribunal could not be avoided.
The legal status of the tribunal is doubtful. Bishop Davies has made it clear he will not be stood down while the tribunal proceeds, and that he does not believe the Archbishop or the Primate have any right or authority to intervene in the Diocese of The Murray. He may well be right.
I suggested a couple of months ago that it was doubtful anyone outside the Diocese of The Murray could act to remove Bishop Davies. Nonetheless, clear findings of ongoing abuse by a carefully conducted and impartial tribunal might give Diocesan Council the stateable reasons and courage it needs to end Bishop Davies’ employment.
I hope and pray that the tribunal will reach its conclusions reasonably quickly, and that actions will then be be taken which will give the best possible outcome for the Diocese and for Bishop Davies and his family.
Whatever that outcome is, it is likely that this will be the end of The Murray as a conservative anglo-catholic diocese.
That statement needs to be clarified a little. The Murray is not an anglo-catholic diocese. It is a polychromatic middle of the road Anglican diocese which has been served by traditionalist anglo-catholic clergy.
As long as their views have been heard, and they have been treated with care and respect by their clergy, the people of the Diocese have been generous in accepting that the Diocese and the wider australian church have been well-served by the special witness of The Murray to a particular and important strand of Anglican faith.
That has changed.
Traditionalist clergy in the Diocese, and organisations like the Society of the Holy Cross (SSC) and Forward in Faith, have supported Bishop Davies to the point of refusing to hear or give any credibility to reports of inappropriate behaviour by Bishop Davies.
Even worse, they have shared with him in efforts to damage the credibility of anyone who complained or did not toe the line. This has left lay people feeling betrayed and deeply hurt.
The crisis in the diocese is not just over Bishop Davies’ leadership. It is a crisis of trust in the clergy.
This sense of having been betrayed, not just by a traditionalist bishop, but by almost all of the traditionalist clergy and the organisations to which they belong, means that it will be near impossible for someone who shares Bishop Davies’ conservative views to be elected.
The Anglican Church will be poorer for this.
Finally, proof of global warming:
But then, what about this:
A new study shows no change in the proportion of atmospheric and absorbed CO2 for the last 150 years.
Many climate models also assume that the airborne fraction will increase. Because understanding of the airborne fraction of carbon dioxide is important for predicting future climate change, it is essential to have accurate knowledge of whether that fraction is changing or will change as emissions increase.
To assess whether the airborne fraction is indeed increasing, Wolfgang Knorr of the Department of Earth Sciences at the University of Bristol reanalyzed available atmospheric carbon dioxide and emissions data since 1850 and considers the uncertainties in the data.
In contradiction to some recent studies, he finds that the airborne fraction of carbon dioxide has not increased either during the past 150 years or during the most recent five decades.
The research is published in Geophysical Research Letters.
Oh, hang on. He looked at real world data. The man’s obviously completely unreliable.
Climate changes all the time.
How do we adapt to these changes in a way that assists the most vulnerable – that is, the poor?
One way is to adopt policies which will assist poorer people to develop the resources and strategies they need to buffer them from rapid climate change.
Another is to make sure we know what is going on, so we can make plans to cope with the changes that are actually occurring.
Because so much data has been lost/manipulated, etc, we have very little idea what has really happened over the last fifty years.
One thing is for sure. it isn’t getting any warmer.
It’s time we stopped playing global warming computer games, and started dealing with real world changes, and the real world needs of people who cannot, as Al Gore can, squander 200,000 kilowatt hours of electricity each year.
Tiger Woods will recover as a golfer. Can he recover as a person?
Brit Hume says it depends on his faith – what he needs is forgiveness and redemption.
Brit’s answer: Think about what the Christian faith has to offer.
Wow. It is interesting (and encouraging) to hear that kind of straight talking in a secular news commentary program.
Qohel is certainly not the most popular Australian blog – that honour goes without question to Andrew Bolt. But the best Australian blog?
I had a very kind note from a reader saying she thought so.
I’d like it to be, but Qohel is an independent blog, with no budget and no staff. I don’t get anywhere near the amount of time I would like to research and write.
Nonetheless, Qohel will have its 400,000th visitor sometime in January.
For the last six months I have had the number one position on Google, Yahoo and Bing for the following search terms:
leading conservative blog
leading australian blog
australian conservative blog
The blog is one year old this month. Given how difficult a year this has been (Amanda’s illness, especially), I am happy both with what I have been able to do, and with the fact that so many people seem to have found it of interest.
May 2010 bring you good times, good health, peace and prosperity.
This will be the last post for two days – I will be travelling back from Geraldton to Adelaide tomorrow, then Adelaide to Kangaroo Island on Sunday.
Click to download the Easy Guide to the Politics and Science of Global Warming
It is a PDF file just over 1MB in size.
Feel free to copy, give to friends, post to politicians, etc!
One of the worrying things about the cherry-picking, data fudging, distorting, lying, fund-grabbing behaviour that has characterised global warming alarmism over the last two decades, is that we now have no idea at all what the climate has been doing.
Much of the original temperature data seems to have disappeared, leaving only value-less ‘value-added’ data.
What data we have, when the Urban Heat Island Effect is taken into account, along with the fudging and cheating, shows little or no warming, or even cooling.
Climate changes can be and have been devastating in the past, rapid cooling far more so than gradual warming.
There is nothing we can do to stop natural climate change.
We can prepare for it. And that preparation may save millions of lives.
There is no doubt that next major change will be towards a cooler world.
Let’s hope we can quickly get past the hiatus in real climate science caused by well-funded claims of non-existent anthropogenic global warming, and find real world data that will give us real world answers.
In the meantime, it is a deadly cold Winter in the Northern Hemisphere:
After considering a number of possible candidates for the next major science scare, the UN today annouced the winner was the asteroid Apophis.
‘We’ve got as much funding, and as many free holidays, as we are likely to get from global warming,’ UN Secretary-General Ban Ki Moon announced today. ‘It’s time to move on.’
‘The asteroid Apophis meets all the criteria for the next DSSO. There is a slim chance it could cause major destruction, on a scale the world has never seen.’ He said.
‘It will take billions of dollars in research funds, and several conferences, before we know whether this destruction is likely or or not. But the consequences of not acting are so dire, that even if the science is not proven, we owe it to our children and grandchildren to put the planet first, and give the world the benefit of the doubt.’
Anatoly Perminov told the Russian radio station Golos Rossii: “People’s lives are at stake. We should pay several hundred million dollars and build a system that would allow us to prevent a collision, rather than sit and wait for it to happen and kill hundreds of thousands of people.”
Mirrors, lights and even paint could change the way the object absorbed light and heat enough to shift its direction over 20 years or so. With less notice, mankind could be forced to take more drastic measures, such as setting off a massive explosion on or near the object to change its course.
Smoke and mirrors?
Same deal as climate change, then.
PS. Ban Ki Moon didn’t really say any of that. But he might as well have.
In honour of former vice-president Gore, Qohel is pleased to announce a new literary form, the goresicle.
The goresicle is a short poem of ten lines or less. It has lines that do not scan, and rhymes that do not rhyme. It contains factual errors. It expresses concern about a non-existent crisis.
The Last Penguin
A penguin circles slowly overhead.
It is the last of its kind.
Below, a polar bear cannot lift its head.
The blinding sun has made it blind.
Despair weighs heavy on its brow.
It cannot look up even now.
It cannot jump to catch the penguin.
The cloying warmth has sapped the engine
of its soul.
Worthy of the Vogons, I think, if not of the miraculously bad Mr Gore himself.
Please add further examples in comments. A prize of $20 worth of karma offsets to the best. Worst. Whatever.
Another worthwhile therapeutic result from adult stem cells.
Useful applications from embryonic stems cells – 0. From non-destructive, ethical stem cell research, over 70, as at 2007.
Researchers have used stems cells taken from mice to create tooth buds. A small incision was made in the animals’ gums and the bud implanted. New teeth grew.
The tooth bud produces a new tooth, and the bone required to anchor the tooth to the jaw.
Professor Paul Sharpe, a specialist in the field of regenerative dentistry at the Dental Institute of King’s College, London, says the same techniques will produce similar results in humans:
Using a local anaesthetic, the tooth bud is inserted through a small incision into the gum. Within months, the cells will have matured into a fully-formed tooth, fused to the jawbone. As the tooth grows, it releases chemicals that encourage nerves and blood vessels to link up with it.
There were widespread reports yesterday that the death of an unborn child had brought Victoria’s Christmas road death toll to 12.
Quite right. The child was a person, and its death is a tragic loss.
But what makes this child a person, and another child at the same stage of development an object which is inconvenient, and which can be destroyed and disposed of?
There is no difference in the child – just in the parents’ attitude to it.
Is that all it takes to make one a person, and one not?
I’m with Horton – a person’s a person, no matter how small.